# 8 Governance

FortuneHunters governance is designed to be **participatory yet protective**. It blends the nimbleness of Snapshot off-chain voting with the security of on-chain execution via a time-locked treasury. Below we detail the proposal lifecycle, role hierarchy, conflict resolution, and future upgrades.

***

## 8.1 Governance Philosophy

1. **Seeker-Centric** — Each fortune reading should indirectly influence protocol direction via popularity signals.
2. **Skin-in-the-Game** — Voting power derives from *staked* (not idle) $FORTUNE to align long-term incentives.
3. **Progressive Decentralisation** — Core team retains safety veto in Year 1, sunsets automatically after Year 2 audit.

***

## 8.2 Roles & Powers

| Role                  | Entry Requirement                  | Key Powers                                      | Typical Actions                           |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| **Fortune Seeker**    | Hold ≥ 1 $FORTUNE                  | Feedback, festival participation                | Upvote lore ideas, claim quests           |
| **Apprentice Mystic** | Stake ≥ 10 000 $FORTUNE            | Validate AI readings, minor votes               | Dispute accuracy, review proposals        |
| **Master Oracle**     | Stake ≥ 1 000 000 $FORTUNE + KYC   | Open proposals, major votes, validator slashing | Launch new festival season, budget grants |
| **Fox Council**       | Top 9 Master Shamans by reputation | Emergency multisig (3/5)                        | Pause contracts on exploit detection      |

**Reputation Score** is an off-chain metric based on fortune validation accuracy, streak support, and community contributions; resets quarterly.

***

## 8.3 Proposal Lifecycle

```mermaid
graph LR
A(Draft) --> B(Rage-quit Review)
B --> C(Snapshot Vote)
C --> D(Timelock Queue)
D --> E(On-chain Execution)
```

1. **Draft (72 h)** — Proposer outlines change on forums; must lock 5 000 $FORTUNE to avoid spam.
2. **Rage-quit Review (48 h)** — Stakers can exit if they disagree sharply, ensuring soft opt-out.
3. **Snapshot Vote (96 h)** — Quadratic weighting till 100 k stake; linear above.
4. **Timelock Queue (48 h)** — Smart contract queue; Fox Council can only *delay* once (24 h) in emergencies.
5. **Execution** — Aragon OSx plugin triggers contract upgrades or treasury transfers.

### Example Proposal Types

* **Parameter Change** — Adjust festival streak multiplier.
* **Budget Allocation** — 50 000 $DREAM grant to neuroscience study.
* **Protocol Upgrade** — Migrate NFT standard to 721A.

***

## 8.4 Treasury Mechanics

* **Safe Structure** — 3/5 multisig (Fox Council) + 1/1 timelock executor.
* **Asset Mix** — BTC (40 %), $FORTUNE (30 %), USDC (20 %), ETH LSDs (10 %).
* **Reporting** — Monthly transparency report auto-posted to GitBook via GitHub Actions.

### Revenue Sources

1. 2 % cut from every secondary Fortune NFT trade.
2. 0.5 % swap fee from points → $FORTUNE conversions.
3. Validator slashing fines.

### Spending Rules

* No single transaction >5 % of treasury without Fox Council super-majority.
* Grants above 50 000 $FORTUNE require two-phase vote (rough + final).

***

## 8.5 Conflict Resolution

| Scenario             | Path                                                                                           |
| -------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **Reading Dispute**  | Apprentice submits evidence; Master quorum reviews via 3/5 stake.                              |
| **Contract Exploit** | Fox Council pauses contracts; emergency fund migrates.                                         |
| **DAO Deadlock**     | Last-resort community fork: snapshot of fortune scores + token balances exported to new chain. |

***

## 8.6 Future Upgrades

1. **Soul-Bound Badges** — Non-transferable NFT for governance reputation.
2. **Real-Time Param Tuning** — Chainlink Functions to auto-adjust fees based on marketplace volume.
3. **Cross-DAO Alliances** — Shared voting power with K-culture projects like MetaKongz.

FortuneHunters envisions governance **as mystical as the fortunes it reveals**—ritualistic, transparent, and ever-evolving.

## Proposal Flow

```
Draft → Rage-quit Review → Snapshot Vote → On-chain Execution
```

1. **Draft** — Anyone with 1 % circulating $FORTUNE may draft a proposal.
2. **Rage-quit Review** — 72 h period where stakers can exit before voting.
3. **Snapshot Vote** — Off-chain voting weighted by staked $FORTUNE.
4. **On-chain Execution** — Successful proposals queued and executed via timelock.

## Treasury Uses

* Liquidity incentives and buy-backs
* Grants for academic dream researchers
* Cultural events and K-POP collaborations

## Community Roles

| Role                  | Requirement                      | Power                             |
| --------------------- | -------------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
| **Fortune Seeker**    | Hold ≥ 1 $FORTUNE                | Submit feedback, access festivals |
| **Apprentice Mystic** | Stake ≥ 10 000 $FORTUNE          | Validate AI readings, minor votes |
| **Master Oracle**     | Stake ≥ 1 000 000 $FORTUNE + KYC | Open proposals, major votes       |


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://project-49.gitbook.io/fortunehunters/governance.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.